-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature][Frontend]: Add support for stream_options
in ChatCompletionRequest
#5135
[Feature][Frontend]: Add support for stream_options
in ChatCompletionRequest
#5135
Conversation
Add StreamOptions Class Add stream_options validation in ChatCompletionRequest
- Introduced the `StreamOptions` class in `OpenAIBaseModel` with an optional `include_usage` attribute. - Added `stream_options` attribute to the `ChatCompletionRequest` class, defaulting to `None`.
…f `stream` is true.
- Updated `chat_completion_stream_generator` to include support for `stream_options` with an `include_usage` flag. - Modified the initial response generation to conditionally include `usage` field based on `stream_options.include_usage`. - Enhanced the token-by-token and finish responses to conditionally include `usage` field if `stream_options.include_usage` is set. - Added a final usage statistics message if `stream_options.include_usage` is set, including prompt tokens and completion tokens.
stream_options
in ChatCompletionRequest
stream_options
in ChatCompletionRequest
The code looks good at first glance, but to verify this, let's add some unit tests:
Could you also update the Completions API handler with |
I will try to implement the tests today. |
Feel free to do so! |
- stream=True, stream_options=None - stream=True, stream_options={"include_usage": True} - stream=True, stream_options={"include_usage": False} - stream=False, stream_options={"include_usage": None} - stream=False, stream_options={"include_usage": False} - stream=False, stream_options={"include_usage": True}
Added the unit tests. |
It seems that there is something wrong with the new schema definition, based on the failing tests. |
18ec2ac
to
4a9f80a
Compare
- Duplicated Usage defenition in protocol.py. - Line too long in several files.
- Yapf formating.
- yapf in protocol file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good now, thanks for the hard work!
This PR introduces support for the
stream_options
parameter in theChatCompletionRequest
class, addressing the feature request in issue #4967.Changes
StreamOptions
class with an optionalinclude_usage
attribute.ChatCompletionRequest
class to include thestream_options
attribute.chat_completion_stream_generator
method to handle thestream_options
parameter, allowing optional inclusion of usage statistics in streaming responses.Fix #4967 (#4967)
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE
PR Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Model]
for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.[Frontend]
For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server,LLM
class, etc.)[Kernel]
for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.[Core]
for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,LLMEngine
,AsyncLLMEngine
,Scheduler
, etc.)[Hardware][Vendor]
for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,[Hardware][AMD]
).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR needs to meet the following code quality standards:
format.sh
to format your code.docs/source/
if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM users understand and utilize the new features or changes.Notes for Large Changes
Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with
rfc-required
and might not go through the PR.What to Expect for the Reviews
The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feels confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:
action-required
label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.Thank You
Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!